PETITION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF

JUDGE HIRAM A. CARPENTER,

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SUPPLEMENTARY AMENDMENTS

This Petitioner wishes to make amendments to the Impeachment Petition against the Honorable Judge Hiram A. Carpenter and whereby filed before the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. Through the introduction of new evidence and the amplification of paragraphs (21) thru (35) the Impeachment Petition shall include this page and appended as page thirteen of the original document:.

On March 31, 2001, this Petitioner hired the legal services of attorney Anthony Zanoni, to file his legal brief in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Please see exhibits (C. and D.) On December 11, 2001, it came to this Petitioner's attention that Attorney Zanoni in reality failed to file the legal brief before the Superior Court in collusion with Judge Hiram Carpenter to assure the appeal before the court was terminated without judicial action to avoid the courts scrutiny of Judge Carpenter for altering the transcripts in the matter of case number (96 GN 2139).

On April 25, 2002, this Petitioner filed a petition pro se in the Blair County Court of Common Pleas requesting that the audio tapes of the proceedings (96 GN 2139) be disclosed for inspection. On April 29, 2002, this Petitioner's attorney Anthony Zanoni acknowledged that the Petition to disclose the running record boxed the Blair County Court into a corner. He further advised Petitioner that (the Court) Judge Hiram Carpenter has no available legal options left other than to use this Petitioner's minor child daughter has his last line of defense. On April 29, this Petitioner's attorney chose to withdraw from representing him in further proceedings before the Common Pleas Court. This Petitioner further maintains and hereby avers that a serious crime of record tampering has been committed by Judge Hiram Carpenter and his court stenographers; and the audio tapes of the court proceedings bear the clearest and most immediate tangible evidence to the crime. On April 30, 2002, Judge Hiram Carpenter filed an order denying this Petitioner access to copies of the audio tapes. (See exhibit E.)

Judge Carpenter's actions in the aforementioned paragraphs are in violation of Petitioner's Constitutional Due Process Rights and Equal Protection of the Law. Code of Judicial Conduct [Canon 1] [Canon 2] and [Cannon 3] Judge Carpenter further denied this Petitioner access to public records (hearing tapes) that are routinely granted to any attorney or litigant under [Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure--Rule 5000.13]

(Safeguarding and Retention of Notes)--(See exhibit A.); and has engaged in a full blown effort to obstruct justice in violation of Pennsylvania Code [Title18 C.S.A. 5105 (Hindering apprehension or prosecution); and Title18 C.S.A. 903 (Criminal Conspiracy to commit - Title 18 C.S.A. 5105).

This Petitioner is certain that a legislative investigation will uncover that the Plaintiff mother in (96 GN 2139) had legal counsel appointed to represent her by the court free of charge to assure legal actions on both sides of the controversy are controlled to sway an outcome favorable to the same court. This Petitioner further contends that the Plaintiff's attorney is abetting the conspiracy of the Court to deprive this Petitioner of his legal rights and preclude Judge Carpenter from being exposed for tampering with public records and fabricating physical evidence as more fully set forth in Petition for Impeachment..

Respectfully submitted,

By____________________

Robert G. Kearns, Jr.

Address

City, PA. Zip